WHERE THE HOKEY POKEY "IS" WHAT IT'S ALL ABOUT

HOW TO DESTROY A PROFITABLE INDUSTRY IN JUST A FEW EASY STEPS

Posted about 1 year ago
New York's "Vulture" section comes to the correct conclusion about the music biz-- but for the wrong reason. In commenting on the Wired profile of "Universal Music Group CEO/supervillain Doug Morris," the folks at "Vulture" have a yuck-fest over Morris' inability to come to grips with modern technology. Ahhh... the good old days!I only had one real talk with Morris in my life. The Warners Music Group was in complete turmoil, beginning a really ugly death spiral that he insisted I buy into by going to work for a lackey of his. I refused and Morris was coincidentally fired soon after-- the lackey not long after that. Instead I wound up as president of Reprise Records.When AOL bought TimeWarner I was one of the only happy campers at the company. Naively, I thought AOL was a visionary technology company which would help us grapple with the problems and opportunities inherent in file sharing. And Steve Case and his cronies were visionaries, but the vision wasn't grappling with anything except how to drain TimeWarner of as much of its value as they could get away with. He got away with a lot.Meanwhile, some of us at Warner Bros decided to take matters into our own hands and look for our own solution. "Vulture" quotes Morris, who went from heading the Warner Music Group to heading Universal Music, lamely explaining why the music business failed to take advantage of the new technology that was leveling so many music business playing fields. At the time most record company bigwigs had contempt, fear and disdain for computers. Many of my colleagues told me they had never touched one - the way Judge Judy and Larry King were bragging the other day how they still haven't done so - and one major record group chairman said a computer is just a newfangled typewriter and that's what secretaries are for.Years earlier one of my promotion men had helped me out at my little indie label by teaching me the DOS system and showing me how computers could make my life easier. By the mid-90s he was running Reprise's and then Warner Bros Records internet initiatives. He built the first label driven web development team and server farm promoting our artists, which later also led traffic stats for all of Warner's online properties. The Chairman of Warner Bros and I sat down with him and went over what we thought needed to happen to make the Internet a real part of our marketing and promotion strategy. He came up with a system which we brought to our corporate overseers. Here's where the Doug Morris quote comes in:"'There's no one in the record industry that's a technologist,' Morris explains. 'That's a misconception writers make all the time, that the record industry missed this. They didn't. They just didn't know what to do. It's like if you were suddenly asked to operate on your dog to remove his kidney. What would you do?'"Personally, I would hire a vet. But to Morris, even that wasn't an option. 'We didn't know who to hire,' he says, becoming more agitated. 'I wouldn't be able to recognize a good technology person - anyone with a good bullshit story would have gotten past me.'"Morris may not have known what was going on, but at Warners we clearly understood the value and opportunity of the internet as a marketing vehicle to connect directly with music fans, circumventing the "gatekeepers," particularly MTV and increasingly expensive and corrupt corporate radio. As we were realizing and taking advantage of the huge efficiency and power of this medium, we also clearly observed the beginnings of illegal music file trading and distribution by fans - and the ramping up of the demand for music delivered over the internet.We viewed this "threat" as an opportunity. Not an opportunity to sue teenagers and/or their parents, but a new opportunity to let people purchase their music the same way they do at record stores. We didn't assume everyone wanted to be pirates, crooks or wanted to rip off their favorite bands - we just assumed that fans of new music would be hip to new technologies - it's kind of inevitable and luddites always lose in the end anyway; people crave convenience.We proposed to our corporate masters that we sell "unprotected" MP3 singles at a reasonable price - $1/$1.50. We wanted to experiment and see if this model would stick.Why unprotected? Because we were already in a vastly successful business of selling unprotected digital files: CDs. If people wanted to get them on the internet - they should be coming from us... that would be the future of the business: an evolution of the day's success.The short term test was to give people a choice - an alternative to piracy.Our proposal, after lots of corporate headscratching, hummimg and hawing, was denied. The technology people Morris was complaining about said it was "elegant" but that they were "unprepared to set any precedents."The corporate "expert's" recommendations:- All digital content needed to be locked down with DRM so people couldn't pirate it. (This made no real sense because the mass-produced digital content on CDs were all out there - and paying all our the salaries.)- We needed to wait and try to develop a secure proprietary solution. One that didn't exist yet; one that didn't allow music fans to burn CDs they could listen to on audio equipment; one that talked only to DRM portable devices that didn't exist (or at least have the slightest consumer interest).- If we did this we would resell the catalog and squash piracy moving forward.So what happened?They aggressively sued music fans.They didn't give connected music consumers any alternative to piracy.All internal and external development of a secure cross-platform solution failed miserably on many levels - complexity, appeal to the customer, portable devices, connection to legacy music systems...Music fans have had a chance to go all the way through high school and college thinking music is free. And now it is, thanks to Doug Morris and corporate managers who couldn't - and still can't - adapt to change.An interesting footnote: in 2000 Steve Jobs snagged our VP of new media, referenced above, Jimmy Dickson... to help with Apple's music strategy... 6 months later: iTunes 1.0.

Comments (21)

  1. asrati says I'm gonna do the GWB thing, and request a summary of this post. A briefing.
    Permalink posted 12/09/2007
  2. Jonh Ingham says Interesting to read your experiences. In 2002 I wrote a piece for MOJO on how music was using the Internet and had some very articulate responses from Geffen and EMI, both of who were doing really interesting things. Morris is so full of bullshit in that interview compared to what I was seeing at the time, let alone what people such as yourself were doing. Right now I'm finishing up an article for WORD magazine on trends in 2008. If Morris is confused now, wait another couple of years!
    Permalink posted 12/09/2007
  3. Mike the Knife says Very cogent, and, as one might expect, scathing. Then, that comic strip said it all and brought the funny, too,
    Permalink posted 12/10/2007
  4. soulrocket says as i see it myself cds came originaly as a way to replace cassette tapes, then some marketing genius/bastard sold them as the next big thing. years later another genius/bastard marketed mp3s as the next big thing once more (originaly intended as evaluation copies). the unability of the majors to deal with this matter doesnt surprise me at all, and somehow they totaly deserve the situation they got themselves into. from a global economy point of view money only changed places... blank cds & dvds companies, internet providers...
    Permalink posted 12/10/2007
  5. Iren says Very interesting, of course a bunch of suits sitting somewhere trying to play it safe an stop change are going to get just what they deserve... Obsolescence.
    Permalink posted 12/10/2007
  6. davesonic says My question is, when do these large companies say, well that's it, we are out of the music business? There has to be a day when it will come to this as they've always been about the bottom line. To businesses like them it would be like cutting off a gangrenes limb. Cut off the dead part to save the body. The sooner the better I say.
    Permalink posted 12/10/2007
  7. contrabandwidth says Even I, as a college Junior (at an art school, no less - not business)in 1998/99, could figure out that you could revive the singles market and offer people a wonderful alternative to buying a whole album of crap for one song if you priced it affordably at $1. Even I saw how it would cut down on the record companies over head costs, could be beneficial for things like re-mixes, etc. And I my friend, am no bizzness or marketing suit in the least. So I didn't feel like I was robbed of a million dollar idea when iTunes came out, I thought about it as - "Well, if I can think of this, surely someone else is already making it happen." I haven't looked recently, but Rhino (who I think is owned by Time Warner) was doing some great stuff via the web with their "Handmade" line, and special releases. Thanks for reminding me that not everyone in the music biz had their head up their asses when the internet took over.
    Permalink posted 12/10/2007
  8. Sturgell says It amazes me how many changes the music biz has gone under just in the span of my life. Who really knows what's going to happen in the future?
    Permalink posted 12/10/2007
  9. ivylander says This is the most cogent and thorough dissection of the rotting corpse known as the music industry that I have seen yet. Many thanks for one of the most illuminating posts on MOG ever.
    Permalink posted 12/10/2007
  10. BerkeleyBob says Thanks for a long but important post. Of course, it is the interesting but small sales artist who has long been shafted by the recording industry--a guy like David Lindley has plenty to say about bootlegging, for example. The brave new world of decentralized distribution of music via the internet and in whatever format (non DRM, thank you) creates some opportunities and some difficulties in sorting out royalties and accounting. Commercial radio is rapidly becoming irrelevant--I listen only to subscription satellite, internet or non-profit college radio. I continue to buy a large number of CD's and have upgraded my system to unearth my large vinyl collection accumated in the 70's and 80's. Fascinating times, no telling what the next ten years will bring, but I look forward to it. Thanks for the post. BerkBob
    Permalink posted 12/10/2007
  11. jason1969 says I got to say, as well, that record labels to artists have always seemed like a necessary evil, and not only evil, but actually detrimental to good art. I saw bands chewed up and spit out, destroyed by Major labels, and they were the ones lucky enough to get in past the "Kiss-my-ring" velvet-rope mentality. Once the technology came along that screamed "The Emperor Wears No Clothes", the major label responce largely was to call everyone a criminal. I'm glad to hear you say, that at least you Mr. Klien, thought otherwise. I think that through the internet, music blogs, and satellite radio an artist can really be heard and have a greater chance for success than any time in the day of the Major Label.
    Permalink posted 12/10/2007
  12. darmuzz says I never imagined that in my lifetime, I would be able to find and listen to almost any music I wanted at any time. I use the Internet mostly for music "scouting": finding out about bands, listening to some streaming tracks, looking up album titles and track listings, and checking tour dates. I am still an avid music collector. I look forward to a time when all bands work on a small business model, and label/distributor conglomerates are gone. Great post, thanks.
    Permalink posted 12/10/2007
  13. ROCKNROLLPIMP says well i for one have a damned hard time paying my hard earned $ for "compressed" music WTF? maybe for ogg or flac? it's like this i have been to over 500 local and other shows.god knows how much spent on merch. i won't count all that kiss stuff in 75-76 bought over 700 lps 1250 cds god only knows how many 45's cassettes and 8 tracks.... but i a "stealing" when i find and or share some "compressed music files" well i'll be damned if i ain't part of the problem...i MUST BE part of the solution. when Frampton Comes Alive made all those s.o.b.s eyes light up green everything changed. now DEAL WITH IT
    Permalink posted 12/10/2007
  14. summer eyes says amazing post, it was so interesting to read something like this from your perspective. thank you so much for posting.
    Permalink posted 12/10/2007
  15. Cody B says Bad Thing 1- One problem started when Transworld and the majors conspired to kill the single, thereby making the album the enemy and singles craved...Singles were the gateway drug to many music junkies who are still purchasing albums today. If singles had always been available and never phased out to boost CD sales,maybe it would've been an easier transition to selling singles on line or giving 'em away as in the last few years of cassingles..when prices plummeted (see Transworld who sold select singles for 49 cents) for singles. I can remember working in stores in the late 80's, early 90's when folks (especially kids) complained that they couldn't buy the song they heard on the radio..The industry basically said...FUCK 'em...Those people are downloading for free without an iota of guilt right now.
    Permalink posted 12/10/2007
  16. SamTheButcher says Way back when, in the days of Napster and all of the hand-wringing about what to do, I suggested (mostly to an echo chamber) that they charge a $20/month fee for unlimited downloads. Even if their user base declined to less than 1/5th of their peak user base, that would still be one million users. One million users times $20/month equals $20 million per month that "the biz" could have taken, looked at the Napster logs of what songs were being traded, and divide up amongst themselves that monthly bounty. I'm guessing that more than one million would have stayed on. Do you think iTunes would be around today if the record companies had taken that model instead?
    Permalink posted 12/11/2007
  17. Pseudo Cyborg says "Further, I have issues with iTunes now offering DRM songs at .30 more per song." I thought iTunes Plus songs were brought down to $0.99 to combat Amazon's new store? In any case, this was an excellent read.
    Permalink posted 12/11/2007
  18. The Time Machine says


    Howie...it is much appreciated to hear your side of this paradigm shift and some of the characters involved who struggled with the change coming...

    As a music lover, consumer and broadcast programmer...it will be quite interesting to see what lies ahead.

    Thank you for this insightful post.

    :=)





    Permalink posted 12/11/2007
  19. Alien8n says I wrote a few posts along similar line after finding MOG. While it must be said that there are a handful of dedicated real music fans within the record industry who do understand not just the industry but also the music it's the case now where it's controlled by people who frankly don't have a clue. For the industry it's not just about getting as much out of the fans as possible, it's also about repaying as little as possible to the musicians. As a music fan over 3 decades there's several things I don't like. 1. I don't like the idea that the industry wants to prevent me from copying my own music for my own use. If I buy a cd I can only listen to it in one medium at a time, be that cd, mp3 or cassette. The idea that I should pay 3 times depending on whether I'm at my computer, jogging or driving is abhorrent to me. 2. Related to this, why the fuck should I have to pay the same for an album that I bought on vynil 20 years ago as a CD that is released today? For nearly anyone over 30 who wants to listen to the music that got them into music in the first place that means 20 - 30 year old music. I WILL NOT pay for music that I've bought already. Kids aren't buying this music, older fans are buying it to replace vynil. Just digitise it and stick it online with a bargain basement price and make a few cents here and there. It doesn't justify full price as there's no marketting involved, just converting to mp3 and shoving up on whichever distribution site of your choice. Anything more is just plain simple greed. 3. If you sign up an artist, release their damn music! To many musicians have had careers ruined through lack of support from the labels. And in no way shape or form should any artist contract stop an artist from playing their own music live if their record deal goes sour. Kick the lawyers and the accountants out and let the industry get back to what it should be doing.
    Permalink posted 12/20/2007
  20. maths says Howie, excellent piece. And I did quote you in an article I wrote for Music2.0 entitled "Time for Luddite & Wanton Label Chiefs To Go" There's increasing reason to believe that it is just a few Luddites at the top of labels that are holding back the tide of progress and technology.
    Permalink posted 12/22/2007

Comment on this Post

Login using email and password below.

Forgot Password?

Don't have an account?
Join MOG. It's Free!

© 2006-2009 Mog Inc. All Rights Reserved