OMG

An exotic bird in a steel cage: Portishead's 'Third'

Posted about 1 year ago
Beth Gibbons has an excellent, extraordinary voice.This does __not__ mean "she sounds nice when she sings"; "she has the 'voice of an angel'", or "she'd do a mean aria".It means: she sings, and you listen. She sings, and she communicates. In my view, she has one of the most distinctive, affecting, expressive voices in modern music. (What a horrible phrase - "modern music".) Listening to her sing after any number of 'cool', 'trendy' vocalists, there really is (for me) a sunlight-breaking-through-clouds sensation. A fascinatingly three-dimensional voice, heavy with real, complex, organic emotion. Not a trace of artifice or empty posturing.What do you do with a voice like that? If you're Geoff Barrow and Adrian Utley (the other two members of Portishead), you throw it into relief. I've always found Portishead compelling because of the brilliantly-managed contrast between vocals and arrangements/instrumentation/production. And on __Third__, the contrast is starker than ever: listening to these songs might put one in mind of an exotic bird, enclosed in a stainless steel cage. Even on the more analogue, retro-tinged numbers, there is a pervading iciness and detachment to the arrangements. When, on previous records, beats and samples may've been infused with the warmth of vinyl, on __Third__, they're stripped to their raw essentials. The uncompromisingly mechanistic rhythms of 'Machine Gun' exemplify this quality at its most extreme - but even the more 'rounded', woody instrumentation of songs such as Nylon Smile sounds filtered, cold - desaturated. As if bathed in fluorescent laboratory lighting. Sounds may be treated with copious delay - but they reverberate in bleak, unfurnished spaces: cold, hard.There's always been something 'designery' about Portishead - a strong aesthetic sensibility. And the combination of Gibbons' vocals with these arrangements is like the sonic equivalent of complimentary colours: a vibrant, powerful shade against a strongly contrasting backdrop that serves only to maximise its impact.__Third__ is to Portishead what __Kid A__ was to Radiohead. The two records - to my ears - share a striking degree of similarity. But __Third__ is the better album: Gibbons' performances are the more mature and weighty than Thom Yorke's.And I'd go further - to say that this is Portishead's best album. Like its predecessors, it's aesthetically uncompromising. But, this time, it's that bit more convincing; more substantial; bolder in its juxtapositions and contrasts, yet hanging together absolutely unquestionably as a unified whole. There are few concessions to the easy listening, coffee-table crowd, as we might've predicted.... But this is, nevertheless, a hugely dramatic record, and certainly not the po-faced affair the above might suggest. 'Plastic' is a standout track, with its stuttering, stammering drum fills and tape warbles. When the bass kicks in, the power is huge - somewhat reminiscent of the climax to Radiohead's 'Exit Music [for a film]' (high praise indeed). And 'We Carry On' and 'Machine Gun' (masterfully separated by the breath of fresh (if still sanitised, hospital) air that is the Inkspots-tinted 'Deep Water') are shapely and mesmerising, despite their repeating, insistent, inhuman beats.Flaws? Only one, really - that lyrics just __occasionally__ veer into the realm of the slightly banal and cliched. I'm not, personally, convinced by lines such as "wounded and afraid inside my head", which are a little too much like the blandly extreme soundbites of MySpace emo kids for my liking. That said, my gripe is tiny - as there are also some incredibly memorable lyrics - notably, the closing "I never had the chance to explain exactly what I meant" of 'Nylon Smile'.This is an album that demands space and engagement. On headphones - or played loud through a good stereo - __Third__ is certainly no less immersive and atmospheric than its predecessors - even though it may lack their broad appeal. This is a brilliant album, and one which I recommend without hesitation to a listener drawn to a highly defined aesthetic - intrigued rather than deterred by a certain degree of austerity.

Comments (4)

  1. Bartleby says May I just say that the deftness of your reviews is increasingly impressive with each new exposé of an artist's work? -- I for one believe that Portishead belongs to those bands who are not afraid of embracing an austere and sometimes bleak aesthetic. (It's redolent of some of Ferdinand Léger's work in my opinion: stark lines and at times colourless constructions which require some focus to get into). The album is very imaginatively described. By that I mean you've managed to conjure images which speak directly to the reader and would-be listener of Portishead. Thanks for making me want to listen to P3.
    Permalink posted 05/04/2008
  2. Augusts1 says Great review Cog. You have quite an eloquent way w/the written word. And 'Third' is truly wonderful. It seems we have a consensus on it, you can read my review "*here*":http://mog.com/Augusts1/blog_post/158043#comments.
    Permalink posted 05/04/2008
  3. Remote Control says Excellent review. This captures almost exactly how I feel about this album. Portishead made an album that will last for decades this time, and maybe now people can finally stop using the words "dinner party" and "Portishead" in the same sentence.
    Permalink posted 05/18/2008
  4. cogwheeldogs says Thanks very much, all, for dropping by and commenting ... Bartleby: As ever, thank you very much. "Austere and sometimes bleak" seems pretty much spot-on to me. I'm glad you appreciated the review ... Augusts1: Ah ha - a fellow 'Third'-admirer. Thanks for the link to your review - it would indeed seem that we're in agreement. Remote Control: Hi - and thanks for the comment. Glad you agree about the album - it's *still* growing on me. And you're right about the dinner parties ... Although, the thing is, I'd *definitely* be up for a dinner party soundtracked by 'Third'. Bring it on ...
    Permalink posted 05/18/2008

Comment on this Post

Login using email and password below.

Forgot Password?

Don't have an account?
Join MOG. It's Free!

© 2006-2009 Mog Inc. All Rights Reserved