WHERE MUSIC LISTENS TO YOU

Vetiver - self-effaced?

Posted about 1 year ago
Vetiver's new record, __Thing of the Past__, is out on 13 May. Unlike the band's previous two albums, this one is not built around original material, but is a collection of cover versions.Perhaps fittingly (given this fact, and the album's title), it's a nostalgia-tinged collection, infused with gentle melancholia and a slight weariness. The majority of the songs are slow to mid-tempo, steady, acoustic-based - and arrangements are subtle, sometimes minimalistic tapestries, in which textures and moods are more important than drama and narrative.This is a well-recorded and produced collection. The instrumental performances (which are often extremely fine: never showy, accomplished in their restraint) are stylish and well-captured, and the production matches the performances and songs in terms of subtlety and lightness of touch.I have some difficulty, though, approaching __Thing of the Past__ as an album. In some ways, I'm more inclined to see it as a mix-tape - in which half of the interest is in the song choices, rather than the songs themselves. The spirit of the collection is not radically reinterpretative (like Tori Amos, say, in __Strange Little Girls__), so there is a certain difficulty in actually identifying __the point__ of it. The record is somehow bereft of a centre, of a unity. This manifests itself in obvious ways - say, the fact that the three consecutive tracks 'To Baby', 'Road To Ronderlin' and 'Lon Chaney' seem incongruously to have roots in a different genre, infused with 60s pop, rather than the folksy americana of the rest of the album. But - on a deeper level - the record feels as though it lacks a narrative. Listening to it, one would be hard-pressed to say what Vetiver were about, as a band.In this sense, perhaps, it's a very modest work - self-effacing. These covers seem respectful, reverent. Which perhaps contributes to this sense that one is listening to a personally-compiled mixtape.As a collection, then, it's rather interesting. But - from an album - I want something overarching. I want a journey. And this record fails to deliver anything of the kind. Despite repeated efforts, I've been unable to pin an identity upon it - and am unable to consider its songs as part of any larger whole. For this reason, I reluctantly consider it - despite sensitive performances and tasteful production - a failure.... And there __are__ some lovely details to enjoy: the brushed drums and shimmering clean guitars of 'I Must Be In A Good Place Now'; the crunchy blues of 'Blue Driver' ... But the fine detailing is let down by a lack of conceptual direction.A good many of these songs, in fact, would make welcome appearances on a 'shuffled' playlist. But, ultimately, I feel little attachment to them in their collected form.

Comments (5)

  1. jenny says Hmmm...from what I understand bands do covers records for a lot of reasons, to fill the space between proper records, to explore ways of changing their sound, to pay tribute to influences, to get on tape things they've done live...etc. etc. I can't think of any covers on Vetiver's regular albums, and I know that people in the band are extremely knowledgeable about sixties folk and pop...why not a covers album? I think their coverage of blues, pop and country actually explains a lot about how they got from the self-titled (pretty much pure folk) to You May Be Blue (more of a Laurel Canyon pop kind of a thing). And you know, doing an Ian Matthews song and a Michael Hurley song, it kind of gives you a road map for how they arrived at where they are.
    Permalink posted 04/20/2008
  2. cogwheeldogs says Hi Jenny ... Thanks for commenting. Yes, I think what you say is true. And I certainly see the appeal of the covers album in the sense you describe. I guess I'm coming at it, though, from the angle of one who's not actually looking for a roadmap. I'm looking for a self-contained work, and that's the spirit in which I tried to review the album. You say "to fill the space between proper records" -- and I think that sort of hits the nail on the head. I find this an interesting record. But I don't think it's a proper record. It doesn't stand on its own. And that's why I am not convinced by it. For a Vetiver fan, though - and for someone who's simply looking for a good collection of songs - I think it's very interesting and rewarding. But I reviewed it - as I tend to - as a standalone work, rather than as a key to understanding the band ...
    Permalink posted 04/20/2008
  3. Bartleby says A thought-provoking review as always. Thank you for sharing your impressions with us. These days, it seems to be more often than not the case that artists take on a covers album to respect a production quota of some sort. I'm not sure about Vetiver but Cat Power has quite clearly made her point by entitling hers "Jukebox" which plays like a shuffled playlist or mixtape than a proper constructed work. Then again I think it's easier to be complacent both for the artists and the listeners or to acquiesce the covers album as pop music requires less coherence than any other art form such as classical music or poetry. It would be quite hard to imagine a florilegium built on a whim but it's not so much of stretch to mix Hank Williams with Robbie Williams.
    Permalink posted 04/23/2008
  4. mollifire says a great and honest review. i love it. i find it very interesting that you didn't relate to this as an album. but i haven't heard it yet, so we'll see.
    Permalink posted 04/28/2008
  5. Permalink posted 05/10/2008

Comment on this Post

Login using email and password below.

Forgot Password?

Don't have an account?
Join MOG. It's Free!

© 2006-2009 Mog Inc. All Rights Reserved