Why I don't need to rock: my official, essentially-unedited rebuttal.

Posted almost 6 years ago
I think what Mr. David Hyman (AKA my boss) and I can agree on is that, for the vast majority of those who find it their passion, music is, in part, a search for the sublime feeling. Sometimes this is an ultimate calm and soothing rest, like a chill; sometimes it is a cathartic release. With rock, I believe we are talking about the latter.For some, it is reached through 11-level rockitude, and this is entirely acceptable. I like Led Zeppelin, I understand and accept that it resides solidly in the top of the rock pantheon, but J.S. Bach's 3rd Brandenburg Concerto gives me a rush - a release, in other words - that I can only assume is similar. Not rock enough for you? How about the Who? Sometimes they do the job just the same. So does Public Enemy's "Black Steel in the Hour of Chaos," which is, I believe, likely one of the most righteous songs you will find on Satan's scorched earth. Maybe it is thought that I do not have an appreciation for the talents of Mr. Hendrix and Messers Zeppelin. This is untrue. I have marveled at live footage of Jimi. I have praise for the Bohnam & Jones rhythm section. I can verily receive and enjoy "War Pigs" by Black Sabbath. I do not have these in my collection; why? Because when I want release, I am not delivered."where is the release?" asks our esteemed Mr. Hyman. I can tell you! For me it comes from the knowledge, the rhythm, the counterpoint and the melodic path! It is a combination. It is a forged relationship. It's when I listen to this samba by Carlinhos Brown featuring Doces Barbaros (Caetano Veloso, Maria Bethania, Gilberto Gil, Gal Costa) and I feel taken by it. I feel the history behind the four esteemed vocalists, the fire and passion of their past, combining with the next-generation counterpart Mr. Brown. I hear the phoenetic beauty of the Portugese language, and I feel the arrangement as if it were a language that I understand.It is simply who we are. Somehow I have become more accustomed to being taken by an atonal, blazing, all-encompassing noise-wall (Merzbow! Masonna!) than the sound of a pentatonic, blues-based guitar solo. The blues has a fascinating history, and I will gladly learn more about it any day (and I do, sometimes), but I do not enjoy the basic musical form very much. And of course there are exceptions! The Groundhogs album Thank Christ for the Bomb is an excellent blues-rock album and somehow, perhaps in the chord voicings or *something*, I don't really know, I feel compelled to return to it. It's just simply not a style with which I often jack my brain.The sublime release has come to me most strongly in the form of the Boredoms. The Super ae record rocks harder - TO ME - than anything I have ever heard by the Rolling Stones, and this is not to discount the Rolling Stones; it is only to show that the sublime can arrive in a different form. Eye Yamatsuka is worth a thousand Mick Jaggers to me in a single scream, and on almost any day of the week, I will choose Yoko's voice with John on guitar (or even Yoko with no instruments) over John with anyone else. It is simply where I have arrived for now.And of course the feelings are malleable and fluid; I would have never thought three months ago that I would be going to a Steely Dan concert tonight, and that I would be so damn excited about it. And I know there are people who don't know that they have within them the capacity to feel the glory of the fucking blues, and I feel glad for the day that they realize it; and the basic elements of the blues and rock have snuck their way into so much music that I love, and I accept this fully. It's just here, in both too many and not enough words, that I scream to the skies: I know release!

Comments (10)

  1. ROCKNROLLPIMP1 says here here may the music gods shine forever upon you...
    Permalink posted 07/25/2006
  2. david hyman says this is exactly my point. as someone who loves to rock (as well as receive enjoyment from lots of genres), i know the beauty of rock. i hope one day you to my friend can rock.
    Permalink posted 07/25/2006
  3. max says bravo, bravo sir :)
    Permalink posted 07/25/2006
  4. Spencer Owen says This is fair enough. Perhaps one day I will reach the blues-based rock plateau. It's not Plastilina, actually - it's Kinky and Mexican Dubwiser. Dunno the latter; do you?
    Permalink posted 07/25/2006
  5. lisbetho says I have seen Spencer rock !
    Permalink posted 07/25/2006
  6. theboywhosawawoman'sbreast says 1. So, what's the name of your IPod? 2. I was just thinking about your post.... and I doth ponder as to what attracts so many people to the "Rock" music..... I think that two of the most telling words that can be used to describe the style might be 'irreverence' and 'arrogance.' The idea that one can take subjects that, for the most part, wouldn't normally be spoken about in the presence of so many people (or at least not in the form of a one-sided rant) and that those subjects are set to music that is.... sexual.... usually not very complex...... loud...... and often celebratory (meaning you might dance to it).... It says a lot. We're able to release our own emotions while listening to this music... because some other person.... either new or out for decades...... is able to take some subject and boldy proclaim: "Fuck you if you have a problem with me talking about this.... Fuck all those negative feelings that rush in and crowd your brain in some time of trouble..... So, my best friend just died.... or my woman left me... or I'm pissed about the government..... listen to this..... rock.
    Permalink posted 07/27/2006
  7. Spencer Owen says 1. Ah, I don't own an iPod. Curse me. 2. Yes, I completely am down with all of these things, and embrace them in many forms of rock-- rock offshoots, if you will. You are right and sometimes I can get release in that way too. Not on record, generally... and I tend to see shows by people who make recordings that I like (isn't that interesting, never analyzed that before)... but yeah. If I were at a Jimi concert I would probably melt.
    Permalink posted 07/27/2006
  8. jackrabbit says this post reminds me of a discussion led here in germany about some bands that came from a more harder way of music interpretation. Theses bands developed from the musical point to something a more soft melodic style. Though the textual impact stayed the same or better developed in a direction that could also be combined with a rock/hard rock or punk attitude they had to excuse or explain themselves for not doing so. Out of my point of view every kind of music can rock you or it cannot. So i understand the term "rock" more in a way of an expression that can describe your feelings about the music you are listening to. Anything else is just a way to put yourself in a category (which mostly fails). Why? Maybe because nowadays many people that are interested in music live in more plurastic or fluxionary circumstances as it might has been before. They consume/buy/like different cars, they vote for different parties, they watch different TV-Stations, they do what ever they like or what they are told to. So is with music, I think. And you can ask if this has something in common with maybe the internet and/or the development of music for the last 20 years. Maybe it was the Nirvana/Sub Pop thing in US that is responsible for this or maybe the Rave/Ttechno culture in the UK/Europe that have left their footprints. In fact nowadays you have less problems with your friends telling them that you at the moment are more in a house or trechno thing than in a more "handmade" style (of course vice versa too!).
    Permalink posted 07/28/2006
  9. Spencer Owen says That is an outstanding augmentation to my post and I highly appreciate it. Thank you, sir.
    Permalink posted 07/28/2006

Comment on this Post

Login using email and password below.

Forgot Password?

OR login using Facebook Connect

Connect

Don't have an account?
Join MOG. It's Free!

© 2006-2012 Mog Inc. All Rights Reserved