Led Zeppelin....Ramble On...

Posted about 5 years ago
Rhythmic Pacing In Led Zeppelin's “Ramble On”By Bill Leigh | December 2006 In our early playing years, coming up with bass lines on the spot can be nerve-racking. We may not have the confidence or fingerboard familiarity to relax and listen for what to add—so we stay with the old standbys: playing the roots, and following the guitar riffs and rhythms.But there’s a better way, and John Paul Jones proved it on Led Zeppelin’s “Ramble On.” Recorded in 1969 when he was just 23, “Ramble On” has an easy feel in the verses and a soft-to-loud dynamic energy that stands apart from the rocked-out blues songs that dominate Led Zeppelin II. The track starts with Jimmy Page’s quick, 16th-note acoustic strum and John Bonham’s mellow yet persistent percussion. Rather than following his bandmates’ rhythmic frenzy, JPJ generated the relaxed and memorably melodic line in Ex. 1. With the track playing along or a guitarist friend copping Page’s part, play just the first bar. Notice any major difference between what you and your 6-string compadre are playing? In the space that Page’s pick went up and down 16 times, you’ve plucked just two sweet-sounding, syncopated notes! The pacing contrast is similar in bar 2, where the sing-song bass part moves up to the A chord, closing the phrase with off-the-beat accents.The syncopation continues in bars 3 and 4, but that’s only part of what makes the second phrase rhythmically interesting. When you look at the whole phrase, you can see note values getting shorter and shorter: First there are quarter-notes (including the tied eighths in bar 2), then eighth-notes, then finally a 16th-note turnaround at the end of bar 4. Music theorists call this “rhythmic acceleration.” By moving to smaller note values, the bass line makes the whole song feel like it quickens, adding tension and excitement with each four-bar cycle. Rhythmic acceleration isn’t shaping only the four-bar verse phrases; it also shapes the whole song. Ex. 2 shows the prechorus bass lick, which has quarter-note-based phrases in bars 1 and 3, and begins to mix in eighth-notes and 16ths. The song climaxes with the chorus’s urgent 16th-note riffs, as in the composite version shown in Ex. 3. For beginners, the chorus may be a little more challenging than the verses, but if you start slowly and gradually work up to tempo, you’ll be rambling on before too long. The last piece you’ll need to put the song together is the bridge line, shown in Ex. 4, which fits between the second chorus and third verse. Here, while Jimmy Page swaps strummy acoustic playing for twin electric licks, JPJ takes on the rhythmic accents that pulsated through that original 16th-note acoustic part, emphasizing beat one, the “and” of two, and four, seasoning the part with well-placed hammer-ons. As when practicing the easy-feeling yet rhythmically precise verse and powerfully rockin’ chorus, remember that you’re doing more than just learning a classic bass line. You’re also gradually grasping concepts that can help enhance your creativity and build confidence for making up your own parts. John Paul Jones said it best himself when we spoke to him in July ’03: “When you listen to a certain kind of music a lot, you begin to think that way—you understand why they play what they play, not just what they’re playing, which is the case when you’re simply copying something.”Push ’n’ Pull“A lot of younger musicians don’t understand that you can move the beat around against a pulse, but we used to do it all the time—and that would change the tune’s dynamic. Sometimes we knew we were doing it, and we’d have fun seeing exactly how far we could lay back—but generally it was instinctive. We’d know there was a song section that needed a bit more urgency but didn’t want to go any faster, so we’d get just get a little more on top of the beat and push it, but without speeding it up.”—John Paul Jones, BassPlayer, July ’03http://www.bassplayer.com/story.asp?sectioncode=15&storycode=16372

Comments (8)

  1. atman says John Paul Jones is so underrated. When Page & Plant did their thing, I was monumentally pissed off that they (apparently) snubbed Jones. In retrospect I can understand why. Having all 3 members of LZ together would have been too much of a "reunion" for comfort. If Bohnam aint there then don't bother. But I was still monstrously pissed off. JPJ is one of the best most underrated bass players that ever walked the earth.
    Permalink posted 01/25/2007
  2. kat3260 says Agree with atman. JPJ laid it down right. I have become so fascinated by the bass guitar lately...this article describes the music in the technical way I've always aspired to; I usually end up with, "It sounds cool."
    Permalink posted 01/26/2007
  3. atman says yeah, his posts are always like that. Makes me feel like a dork. Cuz I always post stuff like "WHOOOOO! THIS ROCKS!"
    Permalink posted 01/26/2007
  4. RGM says Hey Atman I thought you said you use to play six string Bro!
    Permalink posted 01/26/2007
  5. atman says No man. I do have a couple of guitars, but I can't play chords.
    Permalink posted 01/26/2007
  6. Universalis says . . www.crucifiedbarbara.com
    Permalink posted 01/26/2007
  7. Billsterleigh says

    What a pleasant surprise--I was looking for this story and stumbled across your post, as the story is no longer at bassplayer.com. Perhaps I should clean it up and turn the bar examples into timestamps.

    Anyway, the cool part is the rhythmic acceleration in the bass line. Hope that's clear. The fact that I got to write about some arcane thing I learned in college and apply it to Led Zeppelin would have made my baby boomer music theory profs very happy.  Cheers - Bill Leigh

    Permalink posted 10/13/2011

Comment on this Post

Login using email and password below.

Forgot Password?

OR login using Facebook Connect

Connect

Don't have an account?
Join MOG. It's Free!

© 2006-2012 Mog Inc. All Rights Reserved