Philip J. Berg, Esq. Files Federal Lawsuit Requesting Obama Be Removed as a Candidate as he does not meet the Qualifications for President...
-
Artist:
-
Album:
-
Track:
For Immediate Release: - 08/21/08
Suit filed 08/21/08, No. 08-cv-4083
Contact information at the end of this press release. Documents filed with the court and a copy of this press release can be downloaded at the end of this press release.
(Lafayette Hill, Pennsylvania - 08/21/08) - Philip J. Berg, Esquire, [Berg is a former Deputy Attorney General of Pennsylvania; former candidate for Governor and U.S. Senate in Democratic Primaries; former Chair of the Democratic Party in Montgomery County; former member of Democratic State Committee; an attorney with offices in Montgomery County, PA and an active practice in Philadelphia, PA, filed a lawsuit in Federal Court today, Berg vs. Obama, Civil Action No. 08-cv-4083, seeking a Declaratory Judgment and an Injunction that Obama does not meet the qualifications to be President of the United States. Berg filed this suit for the best interests of the Democratic Party and the citizens of the United States.
1. Where was Obama born? Hawaii; an island off of Hawaii; Kenya; Canada; or ? 2. Was he a citizen of Kenya, Indonesia and/or Canada? 3. What was the early childhood of Obama in Hawaii; in Kenya; in Indonesia when he was adopted; and later, back to Hawaii? 4. An explanation as to the various names utilized by Obama that include: Barack Hussein Obama; Barry Soetoro; Barry Obama; Barack Dunham; and Barry Dunham. 5. Illinois Bar Application - Obama fails to acknowledge use of names other than Barack Hussein Obama, a blatant lie. If Obama can prove U.S. citizenship, we still have the issue of muti-citizenship with responsibilities owed to and allegance to other countries. Berg continued: "Eighteen million Democratic Primary voters donated money, volunteered their time and energy, worked very hard and then not only supported Senator Clinton, but voted for her and often recruited other supporters as well. All the efforts of supporters of legitimate citizens were for nothing because this man lied and cheated his way into a fraudulent candidacy and cheated legitimately eligible natural born citizens from competing in a fair process and the supporters of their citizen choice for the nomination. Voters donated money, goods and services to elect a nominee and were defrauded by Senator Obama's lies and obfuscations. He clearly shows a conscience of guilt by his actions in using the forged birth certificate and the lies he's told to cover his loss of citizenship. We believe he does know, supported this belief by his actions in hiding his secret, in that he failed to regain his citizenship and used documents to further his position as a natural born citizen. We would also show he proclaims himself a Constitutional scholar and lecturer, but did not learn he had no eligibility to become President except by means of lying, obfuscations and deceptions. His very acts proves he knew he was no longer a natural born citizen. We believe he knew he was defrauding the country or else why use the forged birth certificate of his half sister? Americans lost money, goods and services donated in their support of a candidate who supposedly was a natural born citizen simply because the DNC officers and party leaders looked the other way and did not demand credentials to answer the questions and prove whether or not Senator Obama was a legitimately natural born citizen, even in light of recent information that has surfaced on websites on the Internet suggesting Senator Obama may not be eligible to become President and questioning his status of multiple citizenships and questionable loyalties! If the DNC officers and.or leaders had performed one ounce of due diligence we would not find ourselves in this emergency predicament, one week away from making a person the nominee who has lost their citizenship as a child and failed to even perform the basic steps of regaining citizenship through an oath of allegiance at age eighteen [18] as prescribed by Constitutional laws! The injunctrive relief must be granted because failing to do so, this inaction defrauds everyone who voted in the Democratic Primary for a nominee that is a fair representation of the voters. Failure to grant injunctive relief would allow a corrupted, fraudulent nomination process to continue. It not only allows, but promotes an overwhelming degree of disrespect and creates such a lack of confidence in voters of the primary process itself, so that it would cement a prevailing belief that no potential candidate has to obey the laws of this country, respect our election process, follow the Constitution, or even suffer any consequence for lying and defrauding voters to get onto the ballot when they have no chance of serving if they fraudulently manage to get elected! It is unfair to the country for candidates of either party to become the nominee when there is any question of their ability to serve if elected. All judges are lawyers and held to a higher standard of practice than a regular lawyer. It is this Judicial standard that demands injunctive relief prayed for here. This relief is predicated upon one of the most basic premises of practicing law which states no lawyer can allow themselves to be used in furthering a criminal enterprise. And by that gauge alone, failing to give injunctive relief to the 18 million supporters of the other candidate, a true natural born citizen eligible to serve if elected, this court must not allow itself to be used to further the criminal and fraudulent acts to continue and be rewarded by becoming the Democratic Nominee. Failure to give the injunctive relief prayed for will insure that a corrupted Presidential election process will only guarantee a show of unfair preference of one group of people over another group by not demanding the same rules be applied to all groups equally and fairly, especially in light of the fact that both candidates are each considered a minority. Philip J. Berg, Esquire http://www.obamacrimes.com/index.php/component/content/article/1-philip-j-berg-esq-files-federal-lawsuit-requesting-obama-be-removed-as-a-candidate-as-he-does-not-meet-the-qualifications-for-president
555 Andorra Glen Court, Suite 12
Lafayette Hill, PA 19444-2531
Cell (610) 662-3005
(610) 825-3134
(800) 993-PHIL [7445]
Fax (610) 834-7659
philjberg@obamacrimes.com
Comments (11)
Bong * coo coo *Bong * coo coo...
oh good lord. what a bunch of hooey....
This guy has been peddling this for months now. There's a reason it hasn't gotten traction. By the way, have you "heard" that the real reason Obama is going to Hawaii is not to visit his grandmother, but to personally destroy evidence that he is not a U.S. citizen. It must be true - a good friend of mine heard about it in a robocall....
ivylander: So what about the documentation he has like the birth certificates? Why should I believe Obama?
Just saw this vid last night. It's funny that he won't or can't produce the documents. Further more, due to his relations with William Ayers, he wouldn't be qualified to be a part of the Secret Service. It's amazing what people will over look to bring more and more government into their lives.
Doomsayer2001: "It's funny that he won't or can't produce the documents."
I thought he did in the video?
Here's what snopes.com has to say. There are many sources for this, but snopes is well-known for not having an axe to grind:
http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/birthcertificate.asp
ivylander: Well so far I found this also, of course I'm not sure if they are being bias or not. Thanks for the link!
BTW I saw first on a multiply post. I just wanted to see what you all had to say about it. I didn't know what to think about this. Thanks again for posting...
:)
http://fightthesmears.com/articles/5/birthcertificate
My experience with these guys is that they're straight up. Y'know, whoever anybody votes for is cool with me as long as it's about real stuff: issues, experience, whatever. But I've heard some truly crazy-ass reasons for people's choices this year. This is one of the crazy-assest.
ivylander: Well I just wanted to make sure, after the last eight years I wouldn't put anything past anyone in government, Democrat or Republican. I'll go with the last sixteen because of the NAFTA agreement. Ross Perot was right about that...
You can't blame Bush for that one, not condoning what great damage Bush has done to our country. But this was a pretty bad decision on Clinton's part. I'd have to say it has contributed a great deal to the economic problems we've had for years.
The stuff people have against Obama is so paper thin. The Ayers connection? What, because he was on the same board with him?
This bogus "Black Nationalist Agenda" they keep drumming up - it's like the wet dream of every conservative talk show host! Run folks, the dark people are gonna revolt and take over! It's such bullshit, aimed at scaring people who already are uncomfortable with a person of color in power.
What about the Carlisle Group, of which Bush Sr. James Baker (remember him- the one who stole the first election for Bush Jr)? What about the Project For a New American Century in which Cheney, Rumsfeld, and other cabinet members sat upon basically outlined a "need" for a "liberated" middle east (i.e. The Iraq War) way back in 1999. It's still online, you can ead it and see all their signatures.
Do you really want to some how connect Ayers dispicable actions, which took place when Obama was 8 years old?
If you really want to make connections, why not look into G.W. Bush's Granfather's attempt to influence Gen. Smedley Butler in a Millitary Coup in 1934. Or Prescott Bush's connections to Pro Fascist Industiralists that attempted this Coup.
People in a public office are inevitably gonna cross path's with some awful people. So basically the anti Obama stuff is either blatant or quasi racist stuff, complete fabrications, or somehow tying Obama to the ACORN stuff, which is stretching it really.