WHERE MUSIC LISTENS TO YOU

Jimmy Rosemond Calls For LA Times Writer To Be Fired For False 2pac Story

Posted about 1 year ago
Jimmy Rosemond, who manages The Game, is calling for Chuck Phillips of the LA Times to lose his job. Phillips wrote a controversial piece implicating Rosemond as a central figure in the robbery of 2pac in 1994. Chuck also claimed that Diddy knew details of the attack before it happened. Thesmokinggun.com debunked Phillips' story after they learned that his article was based on false FBI documents. Phillips and the LA Times issued an apology yesterday morning, but Rosemond doesn't think its enough. Do you guys agree that someone needs to be fired over this?
"I lived with the rumor of what happened to Tupac for the last 14 years," Rosemond said Thursday afternoon. "And rumors are rumors — either you believe them or you don't — but when you have a reputable newspaper like the Los Angeles Times with a Pulitzer Prize winner like Chuck Philips to validate a rumor, then it becomes real. It becomes real in your life, real to the people around you. When you Google me, this affects me regardless, forever. I could always rebut a rumor, but this is something that's well more damaging. And I think Chuck Philips had no regards to my reputation, for myself as a businessman, myself as a father, a family man, somebody's son. And I think he did irreparable damage to my career, my reputation and everything else. I don't think there is no other reward for me or my family that he can do. An apology isn't going to do it. There has to be some form of reprimand in the sense of his job. He needs to lose his job."
Phillips also wrote a story last year claiming Biggie supplied the gun that eventually killed 2pac in Las Vegas. That story was proved false after recording studio logs proved he was in New York at the time, not in Vegas.
Read the rest at "MTV News":http://www.mtv.com/news/articles/1584306/20080327/2pac.jhtml?rsspartner=rssFeedBurner

Comments (2)

  1. mollifire says i'm not hip to all the details, but i've been thinking along the same lines. publishing an article in the LA Times is serious biz. if a reporter decides to slander someone like this, they should make sure their sources are 100% rock solid. Especially when it comes to Biggie and 2Pac man. Peeps are still hurtin 10 years later and nothing is gonna to ease the pain and anger until somebody is punished for these crimes. Any reporter that dredges it up in the media is going to be an open target for that pain and anger, so they better make sure they know what they be talkin about. otherwise, they should keep their fool mouths shut.
    Permalink posted 03/28/2008
  2. MrFrost says the LA Times went from covering the story to actually being a PART of the story. They played a role in the police investigation of Biggie. So after all that, i would think the newspaper as a whole would refrain from having anything to do with both 2pac or biggie... but they just won't let it go.
    Permalink posted 03/28/2008

Comment on this Post

Login using email and password below.

Forgot Password?

Don't have an account?
Join MOG. It's Free!

© 2006-2009 Mog Inc. All Rights Reserved