WHERE MUSIC LISTENS TO YOU

Separating Wheat from Chaff

Posted over 2 years ago
Different strokes, and all that crap. But sometimes I’ll read or hear someone’s take on something, and it’ll just make me shake my head or roll my eyes or utter the random vulgarity.Everybody’s got a right to express an opinion, no matter how ill-informed. And there are those who actually have a public forum for their ignorance. I don’t mean a blog either. I’ll admit it. I’ve been paid to critique stuff all my adult life – in newspapers and magazines, online, over the airwaves. I’m sure I've infuriated my share of readers and listeners. Still, I’ve always tried to be evenhanded and informed when I type up some drivel or shoot off my mouth. And I’ve got a built-in lameness detector. A number of my colleagues in the press? Not so much.Anyway, I’m sitting at the café in my usual spot near the electrical sockets. (If I feel fatigued, I just stick a fork in, and I brighten right up.) The computer is downloading a big .pdf file, and I’m waiting. I’ve already read the entire New York Times and the sports section of the San Francisco Chronicle. I’m sipping my coffee, and then, I do it. I pick up the entertainment section of the McPaper. Yep. USA Today. My first mistake.I notice that it’s the day when their pop-music “experts” (note loose terminology) review new CDs. Since it’s USA Today, that would normally be meaningless to me. But my interest is piqued when I see that there’s a review of singer-songwriter Feist’s charmingly catchy and inventive new album The Reminder.Sadly, reviewer Elysa Gardner is clue-free, smirking that “Leslie Feist is a Canadian indie-rock darling who, judging by the radio-resistant tunes on this latest album, isn’t likely to transcend that cult status anytime soon.” Radio-resistant? Has she even listened to the incredibly engaging, sophisticated, romantic, hook-studded “1 2 3 4” or “My Moon My Man” – both high-points of an album flush with snappy wordplay and dreamy, insinuating melodies that range from Brill Building slick to high-prairie lonesome? Apparently not, because she mentions neither song in the review, and suggests that the artist makes “elevator music for hip people,” meaning “cultists.” (I must remember to sacrifice some back-bacon on my Feist altar tonight.)Then, Gardner gives The Reminder two-and-a-half stars – the exact same rating she gives to the latest bland, trivial, throw-away recording by an “American Idol” reject - Paris Bennett, last year’s fifth-place finisher in the embarrassing, lowest-common-denominator TV talent show.Gardner calls Bennett “adorable” and says that she may “cling to tried-and-true contemporary pop-R&B formulas…” but “the album offers enough homespun charm to leave you rooting for the plucky upstart.” What?!?So an “American Idol” apologist dislikes Feist. I don’t know whether to sneer or be happy. If Gardner had even mentioned one of the impact tracks on the Feist recording, or acknowledged its pop craft, I might be less disgusted. Instead, I remain hip to the end – and hip to the M.O.R. dumbing-down of popular culture that Gardner helps foster by giving any credence to the offal produced by “American Idol.”It’s a sad sitch when anyone with a national platform encourages the same old twaddle, while deriding a fresh, unique artist. But that’s just my opinion. Take it or leave it.Oh yeah. Here’s the video for the jazzy/cool “My Moon My Man”:

Comments (29)

  1. nicki says Yet another by-product of journalism and news as entertainment: USA Today could stand to have such knuckleheaded music reviewers because its circulation base, on the whole, wouldn't feel quite comfortable with Feist. Therefore, it isn't hard to imagine why music magazines would offer much more substantial and well-reasoned material. It's what people will pay for.
    Permalink posted 05/10/2007
  2. Jonh Ingham says Mass market review of mass market artist making mass market sound. What's that saying about today's newspaper is tomorrow's fish wrapper? Meanwhile, 'niche' is the new 'mass market' - if that makes any sense at all. I'm sitting in my London cafe (aka The Club) so look forward to hearing Brill Building brilliance later.
    Permalink posted 05/10/2007
  3. Me and the Horse I Rode In On says It is so sad. That album will probably be on top of every "the year in review" list........and it deserves to be. Then Gardner will probably do the same and deny ever writing such nonsense.
    Permalink posted 05/10/2007
  4. nicki says HA!
    Permalink posted 05/10/2007
  5. Spike says I liked that video; the song was catchy, and the visuals were unusual and effective. Often pop music critics appear to determine their verdicts by considering only aspects of a work that are secondary, such as its singer being "adorable" or having "homespun charm." Another secondary criterion is having lyrics with an acceptable attitude. Actually, it's impossible to put into words exactly how a piece of music fails or succeeds musically, thus forcing the reader to trust the critic's taste, and two people never have the same taste. Over a period of time a reader can learn to trust or distrust a critic through the hard experience of spending money and time for CDs or concerts that the critic recommends, but that trust is always somewhat fragile.
    Permalink posted 05/10/2007
  6. Joxley says Wow, that really is appallingly ignorant writing (the review, not the post), I don't know how such a person can call themselves a music journalist...she deserves twatting really...
    Permalink posted 05/10/2007
  7. Mike the Knife says That's all true, nicki, but it doesn't make me any less pissed off at the enablers. Hope you like it, Jonh. And I want to elaborate a bit. I'm talking the Brill Building if it was located somewhere in Saskatchewan. Horsey: Gardner will do what her masters tell her to do - her masters being Simon Cowell, P. Diddy and Clive Davis. Well, Spike, sometimes "Trust me" is another way of saying "Screw you." She'll get hers, Jox. Maybe when Mariah Carey snubs her pathetic entreaties for an interview on the red carpet at the MTV Video Awards...
    Permalink posted 05/10/2007
  8. Dale says That song is absolute pop deliciousness, and the fact that the reviewer couldn't see that invalidates any review she ever does. Granted, I take a dim view of all those who write for McPaper, but that's a new low.
    Permalink posted 05/10/2007
  9. Rawkkiddoh says Just about fell out of my seat when you called the USA Today the McPaper. Did you get the McShakes after reading it? I have found similar feelings of distaste when reading through the review section of People magazine. Anything that doesnt fit into the cookie cutter mold of top 40 bliss is given 2-3 stars, but Carrie Underwood....shit 5 stars.
    Permalink posted 05/10/2007
  10. mktackabery says I don't know what twatting is Jox, but I hope it hurts. American Idol makes me want to vomit and Feist is divine. I must say I'm feeling just a little bit superior at the moment.
    Permalink posted 05/10/2007
  11. Mike the Knife says Agreed, agreed, agreed, Dale. Cannot take credit for the "McPaper" coinage, Rawk, but kudos to the genius who came up with it. And USA Today and People and Us and so forth are enough to give anyone the McShakes. (Now, that's funny, dude.) You and me both, Michelle.
    Permalink posted 05/10/2007
  12. ivylander says When you know what people get paid to write for (or be on the staff of) USA Today, the fact that they are cretins becomes less surprising.
    Permalink posted 05/10/2007
  13. Cody B says With all the billions of records being released every second, dontcha think the reviewer could find some records that they actually like. I mean why take the time to review Feist if you are gonna pan it. How many "cultists", except Mike read McPaper. And the reviewer couldn't even convince Mike to stop liking Feist. Mike, stick to the sports section so you don't have to get mad,McPaper has a good Sports section.
    Permalink posted 05/10/2007
  14. Me and the Horse I Rode In On says Bottom line....................Feist gets the mog-love. Gardner doesn't. Gardner is jealous.....'cause Gardner wants the mog-love too.
    Permalink posted 05/10/2007
  15. Mike the Knife says Well, ivy. The position of USA Today entertainment critic might well be a work-release program affiliated with the National Mental Health Organization. Really, Cody. McPaper was a time-killer after reading a real newspaper and my local rag. (As if anyone could influence my opinion - other than a well-informed MOGger...) And we shall be withholding any vestige of respect, let alone love, from Gardner for the duration, MATHIRIO.
    Permalink posted 05/10/2007
  16. The Time Machine says


    It's tough trying to filter out what to read these days when the subject matter is an album review. The McPaper (USA Today), Entertainment Weekly and even Rolling Stone have fallen off my radar. I subscribed to Entertainment Weekly with it's first issue and in less than three months I got the impression that every review was written by a twenty year old. I was in my twenties and was thrown off by this approach. It didn't matter if it was a movie, an album or a television show. It felt like a generation that grew up watching the Disney Channel were now in charge and if it wasn't "youthful" enough or mass appeal - the review was usually bad. Every few years since the publication started, friends will put me on a gift subscription list, which results in the magazine getting tossed. I open it to double check that I may have misjudged the magazine only to be disheartened that it is still stuck in the same mold that turned me off in the first place.





    Permalink posted 05/11/2007
  17. ivylander says Time Machine, your thoughts lead to a larger, and very interesting, question: Where can any trustworthy music reviews be found? Not necessarily ones one always agrees with, but at least where the reviewer genuinely listens and cares and articulates his/her point of view with a degree of intelligence. I must be influenced by some of the things I read about music - apart from MOG, of course - but it's honestly hard to remember where.....
    Permalink posted 05/11/2007
  18. chandlersford says Unfortunately we live with the 'cult of the curator' - the 'DJ celebrity' status and the 'personality' journalist. Too many people who feel that the comment is as important or more important than the object. As I pointed out to one cretin 'music' journalist - the day you create something other than ill informed hear-say shit is the day I may read it. So it is with music journalists who are not music journalists (You know who you are - or unfortunately maybe you don't) it's the cultural equivalent of decorating programs. Why don't they get Jackie Collins to review the latest black metal albums? It's the house wife’s choice (I didn’t invent that term - sorry) It's the voice of someone with no opinion or at least one arrived at through no apparent thought process. Unfortunately USA Today is the only American paper widely available in UK and I imagine a great deal of Brits (as they do with all media) take it as Gospel. The bottom line is - if you have to read reviews to make your own judgement - then go and buy American Idle (The spelling deliberate) and enjoy the experience! As for niche market mainstreams - at risk of being tooooo cryptic. If you stick around long enough, the ‘long tail’ will become the thin edge of the big cheese! Sorry - It's just my opinion and now I will have to go and listen to yet another cd just to make my own mind up!!!!! Thanks Mike!
    Permalink posted 05/11/2007
  19. Cody B says Mike, I was just joking about the influence part, bro. Not trying to question your browsing habits either. Hell, when I'm in a hotel and there's a free McPaper, I check it out. As for who to I listen to for recommendations: Mog folks, real live folks I trust, and Dusty Groove is about it. Otherwise I'm more interested in finding out what is available out there, than what people are saying about it. I like to see what is being reviewed and gravitate toward the mag's (MOJO, No Depression, or zines) that have a lot of reviews.
    Permalink posted 05/11/2007
  20. Mike the Knife says True, T.M. It's hard out here for a pimp - of good music, or for those of us who seek out the goodies, especially when ignorant purveyors of fashion take center-stage. But the hunt continues. ivy: it sure as shit ain't Rolling Stone or (ha!) People or the New Times weeklies or their equivalents, but the NY Times is usually pretty reasoned in their arts coverage, as was the Village Voice before New Times purged its staff. I know there are some clever critics out there who might earn a music lover's trust - but everyone's got their own agenda. I guess the best way to go is a scatter-gun mix of local and national reviews, and seeking out clips and streams, but in the final anaysis...Make Mine MOG - the smartest user-driven music site on the block. Yep, chandlerford. Given access to what's out there, we are our own best critics. No offense taken, Cody - and none give. On the rare occasions that I look at USA Today or corresponding drivel, it's a case of "Know thy enemy."
    Permalink posted 05/11/2007
  21. zoot says i'd like to forward your post to the editors of usa today. 'cept it's probably too long for them to read. perhaps an illustrated pie chart, would be the way to go!? regardless of what elyse gardner thinks, i'm sure that veteran music mc columnist edna gundersen will eventually praise the new feist disc. either way, reviewers for the ny times, the village voice and the mighty pitchfork have already raved about it. heck, the voice reviewer said; "listening to this thing is like watching someone throw a no hitter". hmm. we'll if that's the case, then, i say, bravo to feist, and let's umm, ... play ball.
    Permalink posted 05/11/2007
  22. Mike the Knife says Forward away, zoot. Not too sold on Edna, either. But maybe I'm just too Feisty...
    Permalink posted 05/11/2007
  23. Anna says I know only 2 things about USA TODAY. One is that I see the newspaper in most movies and the other is that they have very cool people working at the sports section (I was working with them for a month when they were in Athens for the Olympics). So, I have to ask, what is the matter with the other parts of the newspaper?
    Permalink posted 05/14/2007
  24. K-bot says Since when do we judge the quality of any piece of art by "mass appeal"? This is what American Idol, in conjunction with people like Gardner, has done to our culture. Gardner's world view places being inoffensive and conventional in order to be successful at the top of the food chain in terms of what musicians (or really, anyone) can do with their talent. An attempt to challenge the audience, to innovate, to create music that is deeply personal and not easily reduced to a marketable clip or sound-bite--this, we are lead to believe nowadays, is contrarian and pretentious. What a sad and cynical way to dismiss creativity.
    Permalink posted 05/14/2007
  25. Mike the Knife says I really don't mind the sports coverage, Anna. But the rest of the McPaper is all about the lowest common denomenator. The politics in editorial are a little too far right of center, with regular capitulation and sucking up to the Bushies. But, for our purposes, the problem is the so-called arts coverage: bland, celebrity-obsessed, often ill-informed, and sickeningly middle-of-the-road. Maybe the Red State Panderer.would be a better name for it. And, K-bot, you took the words right outta my brain, and put 'em right. I'll second and third that emotion.
    Permalink posted 05/14/2007
  26. moovyphreak says Been a fan of Feist since I first heard her singing backup on Kings of Convenience's last album RIOT ON AN EMPTY STREET. I just saw that she'll be in Atlanta a couple of days before she's scheduled to perform at Bonnaroo. Am considering a road trip to go see her live.
    Permalink posted 05/14/2007
  27. charm and strange says The saddest thing, I think, is that if "1234" was on Paris whoever's album, everyone and Ms. USA Today Reviewer and her kid sister would like it. Of course, I'm as music-snobby as they are entranced by low-talent mass culture, and I wouldn't want them to.
    Permalink posted 05/14/2007
  28. Lizziegreeneyes says Mike ... this post is positively radiant ... must have something to do with the fork ... ;) *"Anyway, I’m sitting at the café in my usual spot near the electrical sockets. (If I feel fatigued, I just stick a fork in, and I brighten right up.)"* _loved_ that visual :) My coworkers are all giving me _looks_ ... couldn't help but fall off my chair ! *"Still, I’ve always tried to be evenhanded and informed when I type up some drivel or shoot off my mouth. And I’ve got a built-in lameness detector. A number of my colleagues in the press? Not so much."* True dat yo !!! Thankfully, those of us in the *know* realize there are certain places to go to see what's been reviewed & the reviewers we can trust _(you're included)_! I wouldn't wipe my ass with the McPaper ... McShakes or no ... but hey, that's just me ... & probably the rest of the MOGosphere !!! Thanks for your _electrified post_ of Ms. Feist ... Really good pop rocks; therefore, Feist's *pop rocks* ... I have the strangest craving for some mouth-exploding sweetness, you think the "clue-free" Gardner could hook me up ??? I'm avoiding the American Idol variety - it gives me gas ;)
    Permalink posted 05/16/2007
  29. Mike the Knife says Already lined up my tix for Feist at the Fillmore here in S.F. in June, moovyphreak. I'm twitterpated with anticipation. charm and strange: Sadly, you are correct. Friggin' lemmings. You're too kind, Lizzie - and quite a wit your own self!
    Permalink posted 05/17/2007

Comment on this Post

Login using email and password below.

Forgot Password?

Don't have an account?
Join MOG. It's Free!

© 2006-2009 Mog Inc. All Rights Reserved