WHERE MUSIC LISTENS TO YOU

Dark Days

Posted over 3 years ago
(This a LONG post, and it's largely about politics, but it does relate to music--bear with me, I hope you'll find it to be worth your time...)Is anybody else feeling freaked out about the detainee bill that Congress passed last week? In short, the bill legalizes the kind of torture that took place at Abu Ghraib, it allows the government to conduct surveillance without a warrant, and as this article points out, it significantly expands the definition of "enemy combatant". Under this bill, an activist, musician, professor, etc. who demonstrates or speaks against this administration could theoretically be arrested and imprisoned indefinitely without ever being charged with a crime. I don't think it's an overreaction to say that by removing the writ of habeas corpus (a legal safeguard that many consider to be a hallmark of a "free" society), from the rights of prisoners, this bill marks a very dark moment in American history, one of the most distressing in my lifetime. A few hours after the bill passed, I went to see Richard Lloyd give a presentation on his book Neo-Bohemia: Art and Commerce in the Post-Industrial City. Lloyd examines the way that musicians, artists, and other neo-bohemian "hipsters" changed the culture of Chicago's Wicker Park neighborhood in a way that pretty much paved the way for establishment forces (real-estate companies, big corporations, "yuppies", etc.) to take over the neighborhood, driving out a majority of those neo-bohemians who had made it their home, not to mention the poor minority populations who were there long before the hipsters. Forrest Perry's article "Why Hipsters Aren't All That Hip" is an excellent summation of Lloyd's central analysis. It poses questions that were echoed in the discussion after Lloyd's presentation. Several people wondered aloud how artists, musicians and other so-called bohemians in Wicker Park could participate so willingly in a process that essentially undermined their entire community. Others wondered if the creative citizens of Wicker Park in the 90s were even concerned with community, leftist politics, or anything other than making a buck and getting famous. At one point in the discussion, someone bellowed sarcastically, "I mean, does anyone REALLY believe anymore that music can change anything?"It's a good question. As a kid I listened to bands like Midnight Oil and U2, bands fronted by outspoken men who railed against societal injustices and raised money for noble causes, pumping their fists in the air and calling on thousands and thousands of fans to sing along and change the world with them (or maybe just to sing along). In later years I became pretty cynical and jaded about such bands, their egomaniacal leaders (I'm referring specifically to Bono, don't know about Peter Garrett), and the moral/ethical compromises that too often come with wealth and fame. I more or less gave up on the idea that music could really inspire the kind of social change that the great protest music of the 1960s had promised. Of course, I didn't give up on MUSIC, I just changed my expectations--a particular album or song might change my life, but I wasn't going to expect it to make any difference in the larger, increasingly fucked-up world around me. Now I write and record albums and songs, some of which have been described as "political". It is definitely my hope that by questioning my own privilege and place in the world (ie. talking about the war and my own connection to it in this song) I might inspire other people to do the same. But I'm reluctant to use music as a platform for my own personal politics. I don't want to be or come off as pretentious, I don't want to preach to anyone, and I believe that music can and should speak for itself...Nevertheless, these days I'm finding myself wondering if it's enough to just live my life, to work my job, to make nice music and play shows with other nice bands for audiences who drink and smoke and cheer and maybe buy a CD or two. When it comes down to it, I don't think it's enough--not when my government is legalizing torture, not when the presence of a privileged white artist-type dude like me directly assists the gentrification that threatens long-term residents of my neighborhood, not when (insert societal injustice and/or current news headline here)...So what do I do? What do we do? There are of course no easy answers. Each person must define their own responsibility to themselves, to their immediate community, and to the larger world. For a very long time, I've held to the belief that my primary responsibility to myself and the world around me is to make the best music and art I possibly can. I still believe that, but I know that I must do more. So today, inasmuch as this MOG community is my community, I'm posting this rambling collection of thoughts with the hope that it might inspire one of you to learn or do something...And tomorrow, I'm going to this protest. I doubt that it will drive out the Bush regime, but it's something, and it beats sitting around feeling powerless and depressed. Peace...Kent

Comments (11)

  1. champy says Wow. Beautifully written. I think that this post is very important and i enjoyed reading it, despite the unnerving content. Today we (collectively) face many moral dilemmas...in regard to government, disaster, war, musical idealogy, the responsibilities that face those in positions of power (i.e. artists, politicians, celebrities)...very serious important stuff. Great question-Can music change the world? I think so. Instrumental music alone is independent of bias and a dictator of pathos, but it is those who front the band are who have the power to inspire, direct, and propose. I think that this is a transitional time for the world and we are in desperate need of compassionate leadership. Thanks for going to the protest tommorrow. This is not a time to fret, but a time to inspire and be inspired.
    Permalink posted 10/04/2006
  2. ookpik says It's really compelling to watch some American resistance finally jel together (I'm in Canada). That sense of watching and not knowing how to have an impact is, I suspect, magnified for Canadians. We get a clearer view of the doom and gloom in our news, by the sounds of things, but, you know, we live up here and don't get to vote for Presidents. You might be interested in some of the articles over at the "Rockridge Institute":http://www.rockridgeinstitute.org/, if you haven't seen their work. They're the only folks I've seen putting together a big, strategic plan of action for progressives, that makes it feel like it's possible to do something useful. They've got a brand new book out. And thanks for the song; it's got a fitting, bittersweet kind of vibe.
    Permalink posted 10/04/2006
  3. Kent Lambert says hi champy--thanks very much for the heartfelt and thoughtful response. i'm glad to know that you think music can change the world. i hope you're right. i can tell you, you've inspired this particular musician to be a bit less fretful and a bit more optimistic... ookpik... as an american, it's been a rough 6 years watching my government trample on people the world over and institute policies that affect everyone, not least you canadians. i hope there is a resistance that actually jels. the american left has been in a steep decline since before i was born, but now that the democratic party are failing us when we need them the most, i'm hoping that a more substantial movement emerges, and fast. speaking of which... thanks for the rockridge link! i actually hadn't heard of them and am really glad to see a progressive organization with an actual strategic plan based in rational logic and research. i will definitely be keeping up with them and letting other people know. i'm glad you like the song. hi neill, i knew indymedia, but not the other two--thanks! i will be gradually adding more links to organizations i know and/or admire to my mog, stay tuned...
    Permalink posted 10/04/2006
  4. mullytron says Way to hang in there, Roommate. I lived in Chicago until '95, and loved it, playing music and working on instruments and equipment to make a living. I came from DC, which has hipsters, but you know, is kind of beat. So Wicker Park was like hipster-plus to me, and I have to say, I thought it was weird then, so many cool people in one place at one time, being so cool. I'm sure it's off the hook weird now. During the mid-90s Chicago signing-frenzy, everyone's music career (in my circle anyway) was all they could think of; that and finding a cheap apartment in Wicker Park (I lived in Wrigleyville...) Hipsters are not yuppies, per se, but they are professionals, even if only professionally cool. You can't really hold it against them that their neighborhoods get cool, and then uncool people move in. As far as becoming locally active and/or globally effective, it wouldn't hurt any of us to go to our city council meetings and weigh in on things more often. My wife I moved from San Francisco to West Oakland 18 months ago, talk about an eye opener. It's the wild west, and as good citizens we felt a need to speak up in meetings, meet our councilwoman, write letters to Congress, etc. Let's face it, being a good citizern is kind of dull, compared to $2 PBRs in a hip bar, art openings, alternative comic theater, getting ready for Burning Man (you get the idea). But I'm not even sure if we all gave up our hip lives, we can expect music to be a silver bullet for change. Having said that, artists are speaking out constantly, as well they should, and we need it. But your own personal morale and willingness to act comes from within YOU, not from a record. Give music a break, and give yourself some credit. You'll enjoy the music more, and feel less manipulated. Great post.
    Permalink posted 10/04/2006
  5. ookpik says OK I just went back and read that article about hipsters. RAD READING. I love hard-asses. Best of all, it was a hard-assed critique of me! I've been known to distinguish between people who just buy asymmetrical, silk-screened clothes and go to indie rock shows, and people who try to "do what they love" for a living. This bit of the article was a bit embarrassing, and awesome: bq. Some would insist that there is a difference between people who buy certain things to make themselves appear hip and people who really are hip. But... I think we cannot help but conclude that the distinction here is one that does not make a difference. That's a whole new level of complaining about hipsters-- politics of labour and production?! Thanks for that.
    Permalink posted 10/04/2006
  6. Kent Lambert says heya mullytron--thanks for the response! i don't hear too many stories about chicago in the signing frenzy of the early 90s, but the cultural aftermath of those days is ever-apparent. i agree that you can't hold it against "cool people" that their neighborhoods get gentrified, but i do wish that such people would pay a little more attention to their neighbors and think about the social consequences of their moving in and coolifying everything. i can see what you mean about the dullness of being a good citizen when compared to the more hedonistic pleasures of hipster living, but i think there's a much deeper fulfillment to be gained from giving something back to your city/neighborhood/community, whether it be through volunteering for a local food bank, going to city council meetings, participating in sit-ins or protests, etc... i definitely don't think there's anything wrong with drinking cheap beers, going to art openings, comic theater, etc., those things are an important part of a city's culture and are a jolly good time. i guess i've made it a personal goal to to balance those kinds of activities out with some less self-indulgent social action, and i'm hoping that more people might do the same. it doesn't have to be dull! i've met some excellent people since getting involved in a local anti-gentrification group -- a typical conversation with them is much more interesting than the usual banter at an indie-rock show. the forrest perry article ookpik praises is pretty hard on hipsters, but in a constructive way. i think this quote from its last paragraph is particularly useful to this discussion: "From their very beginnings, bohemias and neo-bohemias are subject to external and internal pressures, pressures that differ in each historical period; thus the perpetual nostalgia for an imagined moment of genuine independence (and efficacious opposition). Is the nostalgia for this imagined moment, for a time when artists could live for art's sake, their lifestyle and values not (yet) co-opted by big business -- is this a longing for capitalism's demise? Perhaps, but it is a longing that has been distorted, that appears as backward-looking nostalgia rather than something more future-oriented in character. Does this mean that there is nothing about being hip that might increase the likelihood of one's leaning left? Not necessarily, but so long as what hipsters long for is forever located in the past rather than recognized as a future that certain kinds of struggle could make possible, they are able to ignore their complicity in capitalist domination. And that ain't cool." that all said, i understand that all of this is really messy stuff. i might participate in an anti-gentrification group in my neighborhood, but i understand that i'm part of the gentrification process simply by being a white guy living in a once primarily puerto-rican neighborhood. and while i might bemoan the way that wicker park was gentrified and communities were displaced, i still go to and play in plenty of shows around there and have good times. i know that i'm complicit in all sorts of things that in theory i'm against, but i'm trying to be more aware of those contradictions rather than just being oblivious and doing whatever the fuck feels good. so anyway, mullytron, i'll take your advice and give myself some credit while giving music "a break". the bottom line is, no matter how upset i might get about the state of world affairs in any particular news cycle, that feeling can't even compare to the joy and fulfillment that comes from a great piece of music. i never imagined this post would generate such hearty discussion. many thanks to you all.
    Permalink posted 10/05/2006
  7. Anonymous says yep i agree. i'm a writer, mostly a poet, but i'm writing a book right now which deals with this issue , and i guess my response is one of cunning, to be an extremely abstract artist (marcel duchamp and the surrealists are my example) and yet somehow expres something that gets down to my everyday psyche. so i can't outright preach to people, so i can't talk about ethics and morality, so i derrange the concept of language to expose other qualities that are hidden in the subconcious of societal corruption. sounds stupid, but... it's an experimental book, kinda like finnigan's wake, and it's basically one big abstract expression after another. to my knowledge, there's only one part in the book where i get direct about my politics. to me, i'd rather the politics be up in the air, and let another generation decide in say ten years. but for now, i see complete stonewalling and censorship. i can only talk about these things with my friends to a limited extent cause there's such a taboo about it. seems like we know it's inevitable, and since you can't say no to the future - we are fools mostly (book is entitled - pizza, soda, shoes, importance, immorality and senility)
    Permalink posted 10/05/2006
  8. ookpik says It just occurred to me that if you're interested in how neighbourhoods get gentrified, or get so cool they burn out, you should check out Jane Jacobs' classic, ??The Death and Life of Great American Cities??. She goes into detail about the nature of neighbourhoods and cities, with lots of constructive, researched ideas about keeping neighbourhoods vital (i.e., affordable enough that they stay diverse enough to be interesting). An easy read, too.
    Permalink posted 10/06/2006
  9. jennifer anne says Hey Kent! You bring up so many crutial points! I love that you're asking such big questions. I became radically politicized after hurricane Katrina. (i couldn't believe how so many people didn't understand why "the looters were shooting at rescue helicopters.") One thing that really pisses me off is that it's out of fashion to be "political," especially since being a-political is a political position. I understand what you're saying about not preaching to people. People need to make their own decisions, they need to arrive at their own conclusions. But what is influential and what is "preaching"? I believe that music is not revolution, it is the voice of the revolution. In an interview, ex-black panther and ex-BLA soldier Dhoruba Bin Wahad said, "It depends on the context in which the music is played, it depends on the message that the music is giving up, and it depends on whether the masses of people are organized in a way in which these cultrual forms express their struggle." In other words, let's make amazing music and art AND participate in our political community. So many awesome movements have sprung up in Chicago in the past, there is a great history of resistance there. . . . and don't forget to tell all of the kids at your school to register to vote!
    Permalink posted 10/18/2006
  10. Kent Lambert says hi jennifer anne--i very much appreciate the comment. you're so right that being apolitical is itself a polical position, and with political consequences. so many intelligent people hide behind taboos and irony to avoid coming to their own conclusions and actions. it's very frustrating. obviously i feel self-conscious about even venturing towards political commentary in this forum, hence the comment about preaching. the quote you posted puts it in perspective very well. i think there's plenty of music around that has a message of revolution (or at least hints at it), but the masses are definitely not organized to receive it an express it. i fear that things will have to get much worse before enough people can organize enough to live out what dhoruba bin wahad describes. you're right that chicago has a great history of resistance! let's hope it continues...
    Permalink posted 10/19/2006

Comment on this Post

Login using email and password below.

Forgot Password?

Don't have an account?
Join MOG. It's Free!

© 2006-2009 Mog Inc. All Rights Reserved