WHERE THE HOKEY POKEY "IS" WHAT IT'S ALL ABOUT

The Unknown Power Inside Burial

Posted about 1 year ago
Burial, Untrue (Hyperdub)eight out of ten stars I’ve been thinking a lot about music lately. And I probably shouldn’t because, like Laurie Anderson once famously said, talking about music is like dancing about architecture. But still, I’m human, so it’s only natural to wonder why music—great music, I should say—can take such hold. What gives it such unspeakable power? Well I’m not about to contradict myself and begin here an analysis. No dialectic will uncover some spectacular truth. No scientific experiment or chemical response study will tell me. No answers exist, only theory. But I will say experiencing the inexplicable power in an album like Burial’s newest Untrue makes you want to at least wonder. I’m starting to feel great music connects us to another realm. I believe in something else. I’m not sure what. But I believe something exists beyond our physical reality. Be it spirits or quantum physics—there’s got to be something else. And music is, for such statements, the ultimate defense. Music touches us and moves us in ways nothing else can. Beyond triggering an emotion or a memory, music carves a hole to somewhere else. It’s an escape we take a number of times, in a number of ways. I can think of almost nothing else that lets us so simultaneously release and connect—only god (or whatever) knows why. And it is in this extraordinary experience of the unknown, deep in the throngs of great music, that we can’t help but believe. Course not all music holds such power. Only when music achieves a truth that has surpassed the physical, the concrete and the ethical—a truth so true it feels untrue—can it takes us on an exhilarating trip and leave us marveling, How did it do that? At least that seems the case for the power within music made by an anonymous London fellow who records under the name Burial. Technically, Burial’s songs are lo-fi, gritty, static-y, dark and thick with beats—people like to call it dub-step or grime or house or some amalgam thereof. But it’s none of those things that give Burial’s music such power. And besides, a lot of music sounds like that and can be described like that. But not a lot of music is eternally great like Untrue. Burial’s music takes you to another world—or at least has you believing in one. Maybe it’s because he tapped into something unknown. Maybe it’s because something unknown tapped into him. Maybe it’s because his music lets his listeners feel like he wants to feel: Unknown and untrue—is there anything more beautiful? I’m not sure. Music’s not meant for answers—what fun is the world without wonder?

Comments (11)

  1. Liza on air says hé, hé Laurie Anderson and Burial...
    Permalink posted 02/05/2008
  2. Mike the Knife says Burial is no day at the beach. Then again, I don't like direct sunlight. Oddly enough, I've been in a mood for Laurie Anderson today. http://mog.com/Mike_the_Knife/blog_post/142435
    Permalink posted 02/05/2008
  3. Jammy Jeff says Nice review. I find it incredible how an album that's created using Soundforge can gather such deeply emotional responses from the music reviewing community. It's obviously a credit to the nameless creator, who can touch your world without actually touching a musical instrument. I haven't heard the album, and it's not usually an area of music I am comfortable with, but the weight of positivity from professional music critics like yourself will imminently draw me to my local record store.
    Permalink posted 02/05/2008
  4. jackrabbit says great review that hits the point. i fully comply with your thoughts. i think burial is a unified work of music which means that each part of his work is harmonized, like the music, the way it is produced, the album covers and of course the artist himself. this skill maybe is what makes burial and only a few other artists so special and makes us so impressed even if you are not a fan of that sort music.
    Permalink posted 02/06/2008
  5. FluxCapacitor says "a lot of music sounds like that and can be described like that." Yep, hard to describe his music, ain't it? I had a stab with my review but had to adorn the post with pix to fill it out! I enjoyed your thesis. I think there's something else going on, too...what that is I don't quite know...but Untrue sure sounds like it's offerng up some cosmic clues to the big puzzle.
    Permalink posted 02/06/2008
  6. Oatmeal says Amen to the unseen. Love the album. Kind of a gut level reaction in it, some sweetness in the desperate sounds. Survival.
    Permalink posted 02/06/2008
  7. wallbanger7 says I was just listening to a song by Burial last night on my MP3 player. I'm just discovering them. But more to the point: I was struck by your writing. Very nice posting - one that is very thoughtful. And yes, overanalyzing is not as interesting as sheer wonder and mystery. Music can definitely be a spirtual experience. I just bought a new book called "This Is Your Brain On Music" by Daniel J. Levitin. I haven't had a chance to start it just yet, but I know they now believe that music affects more parts of the brain that most stimuli do. And that it is a combination of left and right brain. So science is on the trail as well. And of course, the scientific and the spritual usually meet up in the end. Excellent posting. And thanks for the Laurie Anderson quote.
    Permalink posted 02/06/2008
  8. fastnbulbous says The quote is usually attributed to Elvis Costello. “Writing about music is like dancing about architecture - it's a really stupid thing to want to do," though Frank Zappa has also been credited with it. I think both Costello and Anderson would rather that quote be forgotten. I certainly wish it would go away. Writing about music may be challenging, but anyone who participates in MOG, let alone all the other music bloggers, writers, people who read music related books and reviews, by their actions show they fundamentally disagree with that sentiment. People communicating to each other about music can enrich the listening experience, opening up new ways to hear it and think about it. It can inspire creative writing too. Burial's Untrue was the soundtrack to Warren Ellis' latest issue of Doktor Sleepless. "Like his eponymous debut, like Ghost Hardware EP too, it's head music, it's contemplative. The textures of the thing are incredible. The beats come from under the road, the breaks come from three rooms away, and some of the vocals come from over your shoulder and thirty years ago. People sing with the crackle of dusty old vinyl. The ghosts of old musics. I'm on at least the twentieth listen as I write this, and I still don't feel like I've nailed what this album is. Because I don't think Burial set out to make a funeral for soul music. But none of these lush R&B voices are alive. They're all haunting broken speakers. They're all coming from abandoned houses, the middle of empty streets, the floor under your flat where sometimes you hear someone tapping at the walls but that can't be right because no-one's lived down there in years. Vocals loop like the old stories of ghosts returning to perform the same motions night after night. The non-singing voices, the captures of people talking in the street, or even whispering, are way further up in the mix. I'm reminded of the old-style ghost hunters, training their mics on haunted rooms, and playing back the recordings to hear, under the bustle of ordinary life, the osund of dead people trying to make themselves heard to the world of the breathing. It's not as immediately doomed a record as Ghost Hardware EP. But it's not as benign a record as it wants to be, or as it wants you to think it is. Even the final track, "Raver," sounds like the 21st Century sadly closing the casebook marked "1992" and locking it in the filing cabinet of failing memory. Throwing it back to the ghosts.
    Permalink posted 02/11/2008
  9. Edmund Frost Booth says I agree with your assessment that "great" music drives us in some way that very few artistic expressions do, but maybe that has to do with the tribal nature of the beats in the particular music. Burial sounds very organic, and unconsciously that may be one of the main factors. The archetypal sounds obviously trigger something innate within us, something animalistic perhaps. So maybe that other world you refer to is more accurately a recollection of the beginning, the prehistoric, drum-beat past that we were born from. However, when you say that "music touches us and moves us in ways nothing else can," I would disagree. Sure music can make us dance, but literature, the written word, can make us want to become better people. I don't think that anyone who has read the poetry of Keats, Blake, or Whitman, can sit back after throughly reading their poems and not want to help make the world a better place. For more contemporary works, I'd say the same of Don DeLillo's latest novel "Falling Man" and Cormac McCarthy's "The Road." P.S. If you refute this, you can't use Michael Jackson's "We Are The World" as one of your prime examples. That's unfair.
    Permalink posted 02/11/2008
  10. Jenny Tatone says Thanks for your long and thoughtful comment fastnbulbous, very well written, but I have to disagree with you on the quote. I do believe music is the only art form that impacts us in a way no other forms of art can, like literature, painting, etc. And I think this is because it travels in time and space in a way other art does not. And I think this is why people are always searching for explanations and answers --- it's too hard to capture or understand the essence or power within music, it's sort of the ultimate challenge. OK, I really don't want to get all pretentious-sounding here but Kierkegaard said it way better than I EVER could: "Sculpture, painting and music have abstract media as does architecture. The most abstract idea conceivable is the sensuous in its elemental originality. But through which medium can it be presented? Only through music. In cannot be presented in sculpture because it has a qualification of a kind of inwardness; it cannot be painted for it cannot be caught in definite contours. In its lyricism, it is a force, a wind, impatience, passion, etc., yet in such a way that it exists not in one instant but in a succession of instants, for if it existed in one instant, it could be depicted or painted. That it exists in a succession of instants expresses its epic character, but still it is not epic in the stricter sense, for it has not reached the point of words; it continually moves within immediacy. Consequently, it cannot be presented in poetry, either. The only medium that can present it (the sensuous/erotic) is music. Music has an element of time in itself but nevertheless does not take place in time except metaphorically. It cannot express the historical within time." (from Either/Or) Thanks also to Edmund, I like your idea, much of music is reflection. I do feel it connects us to the past. But I think it also so definitely connects us to the immediate (what K calls nature/sensuous/erotic) in a way nothing else can. It's not about becoming better people or saving the world or anything like that, it's about being in touch with something through a medium so unlike anything else. Can I use "Pretty Young Thing" as an example? Hahaha. And thanks to you too wallbanger7, I'm going to check out that book, sounds super interesting, glad you wrote to recommend it! And, really, thanks to everyone else who commented, I think this comment of mine is long enough now so I better get to work.. until next time ...
    Permalink posted 02/12/2008
  11. cpetersonart3 says thanks for this very enlighteing post. the likes of which I haven't seen here on MOG in a while. I am a visual artist that listens to music while in the creative process , it is nice to see someone try to verbalize these very abstract concepts and ideas of music and art.
    Permalink posted 02/12/2008

Comment on this Post

Login using email and password below.

Forgot Password?

Don't have an account?
Join MOG. It's Free!

© 2006-2009 Mog Inc. All Rights Reserved