WHERE MUSIC LISTENS TO YOU

Reprising my cranky old tune?

Posted over 2 years ago
Is it just me, or does the new Arcade Fire . . . kinda suck? Neon Bible is definitely better than the dreadful new Stooges album or the merely boring new Shins album, but comes nowhere close to Funeral. I'm not one to complain simply when a band that has made a record that I liked changes their sound on a subsequent record. So I'm not disappointed in Neon Bible because it sounds less anthemic than Funeral or because it is more Mercury Revish piano-goth and more Springsteenesque (down to some blue-collar lyrics). The record also certainly doesn't lack passion; if anything, it emotes too much. I also like the church organs. Lyrics are generally better than on Funeral. I'm disappointed in Neon Bible because the song quality doesn't generally reach its predecessor's quality. For every excellent song there's a real clunker in the bunch. The overall impression is confusion and lack of focus. The remaining faults lie in arrangements. All too often the kinds of vocal phrasings that made songs like "Neighborhood #2 (Laika)" and "Rebellion (Lies)" so infectiously giddy shine with their absence. Often the band overcompensates for deficiencies with the bombast of adding yet another orchestral instrumental component - a musician's equivalent of throwing more plaster on a shaky wall to make it seem solid. Even one of the best tracks here, "No Cars Go" (it's telling that one of the best is re-recorded from 4 years ago), is ground down and suffocated in its last two minutes with this kind of overkill and, frankly, self-indulgence. It's also crucially bad for as epic a band as the Arcade Fire that the production, in trying to deal with the excess of instrumentative riches, is fatally muddy, stifled, and cramped. Overall not a bad record, but highly inconsistent. Let's hope it's just growing pains. Arcade Fire are definitely capable of better. Musical disappointment #3 of 2007.

Comments (11)

  1. Rawkkiddoh says I still have not bit into the Arcade Fire craze that seems to be sweeping MOG. I just downloaded a few songs, and will be interested to see if they live up to the hype.
    Permalink posted 03/11/2007
  2. Mike the Knife says I'd respectfully disagree. Minimum suckage. Better than "Funeral," it ain't. Better than most of the crapola that comes down the pike? Yep. Better than the Shins' new album (except for "Phantom Limb")? Yep. On the other hand, "Neon Bible" could not escape the drag of the sophomore slump. (Even though "Funeral" was preceded by an EP, I'd call "Neon Bible" the official second album.) A lifetime to produce that first album; a year or so to bang out the second.
    Permalink posted 03/11/2007
  3. edieandy says I just wasn't excited about this album coming out. After "Funeral," these guys reached a Tom-Hanks-level-of-belovedness, and they seem to believe their own hype. Perhaps the David Byrne/David Bowie endorsements clinched it for me. I don't begrudge a band's sucess, but they simply bug me.
    Permalink posted 03/11/2007
  4. Nixne Svix says none compare , apples and grenades...
    Permalink posted 03/11/2007
  5. Anna says I recently told myself that if I see another ecstatic Neon Bible review on MOG, I will start banging my head on my keyboard. Not because I dislike them, not because I didn't like the album (I haven't even heard it yet), but because I HAVE SEEN SO MANY CLONED REVIEWS THAT SAY THE SAME THINGS OVER AND OVER AGAIN THAT IT HAS BECOME BARF-WORTHY. So, thank you for this. /rant over.
    Permalink posted 03/12/2007
  6. kaleef says this album was incredibly hyped-up. too much. and after many listens, funeral remains better (in our minds?) than neon. oh well, maybe a couple more months i'll pick it back up and give it a sophmore's chance listen...
    Permalink posted 03/12/2007
  7. 1234chainsaw says Like Anna, I dislike the fact that most reviews sound canned and cloned. But I'm not being contrarian for the sake of being one; either all those critics are hearing something I'm not, or it's good old tacit peer pressure at work. I agree with Mike that Neon Bible will probably be better than about 95% of the music that will be released this year, most of which I'll never hear if I have any luck at all. But we know that there is just an awful lot of absolute swill out there, so being in the top 5% isn't really that much of an achievement. They did have about three years, not just one, to bang out the new one. But when I think of half of the record, I'm not thinking "Wow, I can see how this took three years to mature." So I stand by my assessment that there is more than minimum suckage. Incidentally, why is it that the one and only MOG tag that shows up for the band is "The Arcade Fire" when their name is "Arcade Fire"? I'm guessing this is the reason why, in my widgets, the album shows up as being made by "Various artists." I set the ID tags for "Arcade Fire" not "The Arcade Fire". (This isn't my only gripe of this kind with the Gracenote matching system.)
    Permalink posted 03/12/2007
  8. Nixne Svix says waht i meant FYI , by none compares , is they are all so different ...as far as Neon Bible , I had never heard but a couple of tunes by Arcade a few times....so point of reference..
    Permalink posted 03/12/2007
  9. Rawkkiddoh says I listened to a couple songs, and liked what I heard. I tried not to read the millions of reviews on how the album was god like before I listened to it. I like what I heard, and I am going to get it just to give it a full listen.
    Permalink posted 03/12/2007
  10. bohemianlullaby says i agree with mike. especially on the minimum suckage. i will say that neon bible, unlike funeral, is meant to be listened to as a whole. you can listen to any of the neighborhoods, crown of love, rebellion, etc. on funeral and feel like it's enough. the same can't be said about neon bible, especially with the middle section of songs (which is where i think this minimum suckage is located). but i must agree with you that "no cars go" is one of the standout tracks of the album.
    Permalink posted 03/12/2007
  11. 1234chainsaw says I listen to albums as a whole. That’s what I do on my stereo, and albums are what I load onto my digital player. I spun Neon Bible half a dozen times over a few days before writing up my little take on it. Like bohemianlullaby suggests, it’s true that Neon Bible plays more as an interconnected whole at the level of music (on Funeral that unity didn’t go much further than the song title continuum). Like Cameron suggests, the sound on the two records is sufficiently different to make any direct comparison difficult to track. But I don’t think it makes an overall evaluative comparison impossible or, in this case, particularly difficult. Thank you all for thoughtful and challenging feedback! That you sometimes get it is one thing that I truly appreciate about MOG.
    Permalink posted 03/12/2007

Comment on this Post

Login using email and password below.

Forgot Password?

Don't have an account?
Join MOG. It's Free!

© 2006-2009 Mog Inc. All Rights Reserved